ComplyDossier ZA

Aligned with the Sept 2025 Code of Good Practice: DismissalECTA Sec 13 Compliant Digital SignaturesInstant PayFast Checkout (Capitec Pay & Instant EFT)

Misconduct · Charge Sheet Template

Granting Unauthorised Discounts or Waiving Company Fees Charge Sheet & Hearing Pack

Charge sheet for granting unauthorised discounts, waiving fees or breaching pricing authority limits under the Sept 2025 Code.

9%

Step 1 · Offence & Statutory Guardrail Intake

No login needed. Your answers autosave on this device and to a secure draft.

2025 Code Offence Guide & Sanction Rule — Granting Unauthorised Discounts or Waiving Company Fees

What must be proven: Show the discount authority limits and that the employee knew them; Quantify the financial loss to the company.

First-offence guideline: If the employee benefited personally or acted dishonestly, treat it as dishonesty (possible dismissal). A genuine error or misunderstanding of authority limits usually attracts a written warning. Prove the authority limits were communicated.

Recommended action mode: Direct Warning Pack — corrective discipline is usually appropriate for a first offence; escalate to a hearing for repeat or serious cases.

Example wording: It is alleged that on or about 15 January 2026, at the workplace, you granted an unauthorised discount and/or waived Company fees without the required authority, in that you as will be set out in evidence at the hearing, causing the Company financial loss.

Or pick the closest symptom — we configure the charge, alternative and action mode:

No automatic alternative for this offence. Do not add an unsupported allegation.

Prior warnings on file

None recorded.

Understanding this offence: Granting Unauthorised Discounts or Waiving Company Fees

LRA 66 of 1995; delegated pricing authority / Company discount policy; Code of Good Practice: Dismissal (Sept 2025).

Standard charge formulation

First-offence sanction guideline: If the employee benefited personally or acted dishonestly, treat it as dishonesty (possible dismissal). A genuine error or misunderstanding of authority limits usually attracts a written warning. Prove the authority limits were communicated.

CCMA procedural fairness checklist

  • Show the discount authority limits and that the employee knew them
  • Quantify the financial loss to the company
  • Establish who benefited from the discount
  • Check whether the employee gained personally (dishonesty) or erred (negligence)
  • Review POS/system records for a pattern

Guidance only — establish the facts, consider the employee's response, consistency and mitigation. No automatic sanction or guaranteed CCMA outcome.

Standard charge formulation

Statutory guidance

Statutory referenceLRA 66 of 1995; delegated pricing authority / Company discount policy; Code of Good Practice: Dismissal (Sept 2025).
First-offence sanction guidelineIf the employee benefited personally or acted dishonestly, treat it as dishonesty (possible dismissal). A genuine error or misunderstanding of authority limits usually attracts a written warning. Prove the authority limits were communicated.
CategoryMisconduct

CCMA procedural fairness checklist

  • Show the discount authority limits and that the employee knew them
  • Quantify the financial loss to the company
  • Establish who benefited from the discount
  • Check whether the employee gained personally (dishonesty) or erred (negligence)
  • Review POS/system records for a pattern

Frequently asked questions

Is giving an unauthorised discount theft?
Only if the employee acted dishonestly or benefited personally. Otherwise it is a breach of authority limits — usually a warning.
Can I recover the discounted amount?
Only with written agreement or legal process — not by unilateral wage deduction (BCEA s34).